COUNSELING
CENTER
COLLEGE
PARK, MARYLAND
CHANGES
IN THE SOCIAL CLIMATE OF A COLLEGE CAMPUS
OVER A
DECADE
Alyce C.
Martinez and William E. Sedlacek
Research
Report # 4-82
COUNSELING
CENTER
UNIVERSITY
OF MARYLAND
COLLEGE
PARK, MARYLAND
Alyce C.
Martinet and William E. Sedlacek
Research
Report # 4-82
SUMMARY
The purpose of this study was to compare perceptions of
peer group attitudes of college students in 1970 and 1981. The responses of 310
white, incoming freshmen attending the 1981 orientation programs at the
University of Maryland, College Park, were compared to those of 204 white
freshmen who attended orientation programs in 1970. Subjects in both samples
completed questionnaires in which they indicated their perceptions of how most
college students felt about persons holding certain. beliefs. There were
significant differences on eight out of sixteen items. Communists, socialists, liberals,
persons favoring gradual desegregation, and cigarette smokers were seen more
negatively in 1981 than in 1970. In contrast, conservatives, people favoring
U.S. foreign policy, and persons favoring premarital sex were seen more
positively. The nature of change in student attitudes is discussed and
implications for program planning are made.
An assumption that is often made by college and university
faculty, staff, and administrators is that college students of the 1980's are
drastically different from their counterparts of the late 1960's and early
1970's. The differences that are assumed to exist cover a broad range of
opinions, attitudes, and behavior in social, cultural, political, and personal
contexts. Yet despite the interest of college personnel in the assessment of student
attitudes and behaviors, some feel the emphasis has too often been on
researching current attitudes and relying on subjective impressions about
change. According to Vacc and Silvestro (1980), attitude change itself is
rarely measured. These authors state that "colleges generally have not
been self-conscious about assessing changes in their student populations
beyond reporting entrance scores and student grades" (p. 14).
One way to examine changes in the college student
population is to examine changes in the social climate on college campuses. The
social climate, the context in which people operate, is defined by the socially
agreed upon norms of what constitutes acceptable behavior. In general,
information about the social climate can be important in understanding the
phenomenological world of the subject. population; or, in other words, the
campus seen through the eyes of students. Such knowledge enables predictions
and interpretations of attitudes and beliefs to be made with greater accuracy.
Specifically, research on racial attitudes, for example,
has found that the social climate and situational context play an important
role in understanding the complex relationships between attitudes and
behavior. Sedlacek and Brooks (1971) found that there is a difference between
what white college students believe are socially acceptable attitudes toward
blacks and what they really feel. Though students perceived less social
acceptability for racially prejudiced attitudes, they nevertheless held
negative attitudes. One
2.
conclusion that might be drawn from that research is that
it is important to place attitudes in a broader situational context such as the
climate in which they occur.
One way of understanding a given social climate is to ask
members their perceptions of what the prevailing attitudes are within that
context. Using that methodology, this study is an attempt to assess shifts in
the social climate of a university campus over a decade. By focusing on change
at one particular campus, the problem of comparing different populations is
diminished, and this enables the campus to serve its student community better
through planning and implementing programs tailored to the specific needs of
its students.
METHOD
In the summer of 1970, a representative sample of 204
white, entering freshmen at the University of "Maryland, College Park
(UMCP) indicated their perceptions of tae social values on college campuses
(Sedlacek & Brooks, 1971). In 1981, a representative sample of 310 white
freshmen entering UMCP responded to an anonymous poll similar to that used by
Sedlacek and Brooks in 1970.
Both questionnaires asked respondents to indicate how they
thought most college students felt about people holding certain beliefs. The
items were based on contemporary issues, racial concerns, and beliefs derived
from Rokeach, Smith and Evans (1960).
Sixteen of the original 20 items in the 1970 questionnaire
were used again in 1951. The remaining four original items were eliminated in
the updated version because they no longer represented relevant campus issues
(e.g., "Someone favoring coed dorms ").
3.
RESULTS
Table 1 shows the means, standard deviations and t-tests
for the 1970 and 1981 samples. There were significant differences (p<.05) on
eight of the 16 items. Communists, socialists, liberals, cigarette smokers, and
those favoring gradual desegregation were perceived more negatively in 1981
than in 1970. In contrast, those seen more positively in 1981 were
conservatives, those favoring U.S. foreign policy, and those favoring
premarital sex.
DISCUSSION
The changes in social climate over the decade of the
1970's can be discussed in terms of three contexts: political, racial, and
personal.
Most of the changes found in this study reflect changes in
political attitudes. Most notably, there is a trend toward political
conservatism that has also been documented elsewhere (c.f. Maeroff, 1978). In
1970, when the study was first conducted, the political climate on college
campuses was one of antiwar sentiment over Viet Nam. Many students were angered
by government policies, and organized protests and demonstrations on college
campuses across the country. In contrast, in the late 1970's and early 1980's
there was a growing concern about perceived deterioration in U.S. military
superiority and the impracticality of detente as a foreign policy. Perhaps
world events such as the Russian invasion of Afghanistan, labor unrest in
Poland, and the hostage crisis in Iran may be related to the more negative
attitudes perceived toward alternative political ideologies, such as communism
and socialism.
Interestingly, though students in 1981 tended to feel
college students agreed more with government policy, they still felt students
reserved the right to protest when they do not. In both 1970 and 1981 students
felt that students disagreed with the item "Protest is never
justified." Although a common assumption is that current
4.
college students are less likely to protest than the
students of the early 1970's, it might be more useful to look at student
willingness to protest on an issue by issue basis, rather than stating blanket
generalizations.
In comparison to the political context, there was little
change in racial attitudes between 1970 and 1981. Racist attitudes continued to
be negatively perceived. Of six items referring to race, only one reflected a
statistically significant change: that relating to gradual desegregation. This
item is difficult to interpret, however. It is unclear whether subjects were
responding to the issue of desegregation per se or to the rate at which it is
accomplished. It is therefore unclear whether tote decreased acceptance of
gradual desegregation. in 1981 means that white college students were
exhibiting less concern for racial integration. An alternative interpretation
might be that they felt unsure whether it should be accomplished rapidly rather
than gradually.
There may be some evidence to suggest that the hypothesis
of less concern nay he correct, however. Students may continue to perceive that
racism is not acceptable, but view it relatively more positively than they do
other issues. For example, in the 1970 sample, the most negatively rated items
were "racist and `bigot." But in 19a1, these ite=ms (whose means,
however, were not significantly different from the 1970 sample) were no longer
the most negatively rated items. "communist" was rated more
negatively than both "racist" or "bigot." In essence, the
data may be suggesting that white college students currently believe there are
worse things one can be than a racist. Racist beliefs were still negatively
reinforced, but perhaps not as negatively as other beliefs one could hold.
There is also evidence of changing behavior and values in
a personal context. Though current college students may be seen as politically
conservative, they may
5.
not be seen as socially conservative, at :least with
regard to the acceptance of premarital sex. Perhaps the sexual revolution of
the late 1960's and early 1970's has had such a fundamental effect on society
that the social conservatism of groups like the Moral Majority has not been
able to penetrate the social norm. In support of the present study, Vacc and
Silvestro (1980) also found that acceptance of premarital sex in college
students had increased.
Another change in personal values concerns the decreased
acceptance of cigarette smoking. Although freshmen are not likely to be smokers
(McKillip and Vierke, 1980; Wechsler and Gottlieb, 1979), they perceived more
acceptance for smoking ten years ago. This may reflect the influence of the
Surgeon General's report and groups litre the American Cancer Society, which
have warned about the health risks of smoking. Supporting evidence from Vacc
and Silvestro (1980) indicates that ass of 1978, there was a significant trend toward
not smoking.
Overall, then, it appears that trends in perceptions of
student norms vary according to topic. For example, there was a great deal of
change politically, but comparatively little change an racial attitudes. Even
within a given topic, change is relative. In the political context, there kris
a trend toward conservatism in many areas, but less so in others such as social
acceptability of protest.
Another conclusion that can be drawn is that assumptions
about how college students change often can be misleading. Change does not
occur equally across all topics and all populations. Administrators, faculty,
and others interested in college students might be served better by testing
their assumptions empirically than by relying on myths about student attitudes
and behaviors.
6.
Survey research of this type may lead to better
coordination and planning of services and programs such as orientation, student
activities, or counseling and health services. For example, since college
students currently perceive smoking negatively, it might be useful to develop
programs or workshops on how to stop smoking. Counseling services might be
sensitive to the coping strategies needed by students who might feel apart from
the mainstream in terms of political and social attitudes. For example,
consider the pressures on a student who decides to be sexually inactive in a
climate where premarital sex is the norm. Additionally, programs such as
orientation could be updated periodically, based on the discrepancy between
perceived norms and actual student attitudes and behavior.
REFERENCES
Maeroff, G. Most college freshmen in poll shun liberal
label. New York Times, January 22, 1978, p. 30.
McKillip, .T. & Vierke, S. College smokers: Worried
sick, but still puffing. Journal of the American College Health Association,
1980, 28, 280-282.
Rokeach, M., Smith, P., & Evans, R. Two kinds of
prejudice or one? In Rokeach, M. (Ed.) The open and closed mind. New
Work: Basic Books, 1960, pp. 132-168.
Sedlacek, W.E. and Brooks, G.C., Jr. Social acceptability
in the measurement of racial attitudes. Psychological Reports, 1971, 29,
17-18.
Vacc, N.A. & Silvestro J.R. Changing college students:
A comparison of attitudes and opinions in 1967 and 1978. College student
Journal, 1980, 14, 14-18.
Wechsler, H. & Gottleib, N.H. Smoking among New
England college men and women. Journal of the American College Health
Association, 1979, 28, 155-157 .
8.
Table 1: How Freshmen Thought Most College Students
Felt About Holding Certain Beliefs |
|
|||||
|
|
1970 (N=204) |
|
1981 (N=310) |
||
Item |
|
Mean |
S.D. |
|
Mean |
S.D. |
atheist |
|
3.28 |
0.89 |
|
3.42 |
0.75 |
bigot |
|
4.16 |
1.1 |
|
4.08 |
0.76 |
someone pro-labor union |
|
2.73 |
0.88 |
|
2.8 |
0.65 |
communist |
|
3.99* |
0.98 |
|
4.48* |
0.71 |
racist |
|
4.18 |
1.08 |
|
4.19 |
0.77 |
someone favoring U.S.
foreign policy |
|
2.86* |
1.16 |
|
2.53* |
0.8 |
someone favoring
premarital sex |
|
2.46* |
1.08 |
|
2.19* |
0.83 |
liberal |
|
2.06* |
0.95 |
|
2.40* |
0.85 |
against interracial
fraternities or sororities |
|
3.75 |
1.07 |
|
3.75 |
0.9 |
socialist |
|
3.12* |
0.92 |
|
3.3 |
0.79 |
believes in fundamental
racial differences |
|
3.38 |
1.11 |
|
3.56 |
1.02 |
favors U.S. space program |
|
2.11 |
0.97 |
|
1.97 |
0.82 |
smokes cigarettes |
|
2.77 |
0.72 |
|
3.26* |
0.82 |
for gradual desegregation |
|
2.63 |
0.92 |
|
2.99* |
0.94 |
a conservative |
|
3.22 |
0.91 |
|
2.94* |
0.77 |
feels protest is never
justified |
|
3.84 |
1.15 |
|
3.73* |
0.74 |
* significant at p <.05, using t
(1 = Strongly positive feelings; 5 = Strongly negative
feelings)