Parents
as Referral Agents: A Retention Intervention
Research
Report # 10-90
The
Counseling Center Retention Study Group
Vivian
Boyd, Patricia Hunt, Stanley Hunt,
Thomas
Magoon, Bekele Molla, John Van Brunt
Computer
time for this project has been provided in full through the Computer Science
Center of the University of Maryland at College Park.
Parents
as Referral Agents: A Retention Intervention
Parents
as Referral Agents: A Retention Intervention
Counseling
Center Retention Study Group*
Research
Report # 10-90
Summary
Parents who take an active interest in their child's
college experience may be serving an important function as an influence
encouraging their child to remain in college until graduation. Parents who are
aware enough of the specific campus resources available to help students
confront barriers to academic success to serve as referral agents for their
child may contribute doubly toward that goal. The present study combines the
interest of parents in helping their child have a successful experience at
college, with the availability of the Resource Manual, which lists and
briefly describes the variety of resources available to students at the
University of Maryland at College Park.
During two sessions of the 1988 Summer Parent
Orientation, a parents' support project was described, in which parents would
be given information sufficient to help them serve as resource referral agents
for their child. Sixty-nine sets of interested parents were identified,
and were subsequently sent a copy of the Resource Manual. Fifty sets of
parents were randomly selected from a Parent Orientation session in which no
mention of the parents' support project was made, to serve as a comparison
group. In January at the time grades were mailed, participating parents were
sent an evaluation form, in part to assess the use and usefulness of the
manual, and in part to remind parents of the manual's potential helpfulness.
Students whose parents participated in the parents'
support project persisted at significantly higher rates than students in the comparison group, and did so in good academic standing. Four
semesters after matriculation, over 3/4 of the treatment group were still
enrolled at UMCP, and 72% were in good academic standing, while 2/3 of the
comparison group were still enrolled, and 58% were in good academic standing.
Giving parents printed material helpful in making
parental support informed, at least about resources on campus, seems to be an
effective and cost-efficient way of helping their students achieve their
academic goals.
* Vivian
Boyd, Patricia Hunt, Stanley Hunt, Thomas Magoon, Bekele Molla, John Van Brunt
Parents as Referral Agents: A Retention Intervention
The
Counseling Center Retention Study Group*
Parents who take an active interest in their child's
college experience may be serving an important function as an influence
encouraging their child to remain in college until graduation. Parents who can
act as a referral agent when their child is in academic difficulty,
particularly during the freshman year, may serve an even more critical role.
Although at new student orientation, freshmen are introduced to the large
variety of support services available on campus, this type of information
typically is not remembered. Furthermore, it is unlikey that parents, despite
their interest in their child's college experience, will be aware of the
specific campus resources available to their child.
The Retention Study Group maintains a Resource
Manual, the table of contents of which lists 23 common barriers to academic
success. For each barrier, the manual lists and briefly describes resources
that students can consider pursuing. Each entry gives a description of the
resource or program, its location and, where relevant, the phone number to call
either to set up an appointment or to obtain further information. Because
students respond
* Vivian
Boyd, Patricia Hunt, Stanley Hunt, Thomas Magoon, Bekele Molla, John Van Brunt
1
differently to different resource aids, the manual
describes a variety of resource approaches (e.g., individual work, groups,
tapes, written material) made available to help students achieve their academic
goals.
The present study combines the availability of the Resource
Manual with the interest of parents in helping their child have a
successful first year at college.
METHOD
During two summer sessions of the 1988 Parent
Orientation (i.e., orientation for the parents of incoming freshmen at the
University of Maryland at College Park), the need for and uses of the Resource
Manual were described to parents. Parents attending these sessions were
shown copies of the manual, and were asked to demonstrate their interest in
participating in the academic success of their child by adding their name,
phone number, and Fall 1988 mailing address to a signup sheet of parents
interested in participating in the parents support project. They were told that
in the fall they would receive an updated copy of the Resource Manual so
that they could feel informed about helping their child locate appropriate support
services when and if such were needed during the academic year. Fifty parent
sets attending the next week's parent orientation session, where there was no
exposure to the project, served as a comparison group.
In early January 1989 an (unsigned) evaluation form
was mailed to participating parents, in part to discover if the Resource
Manual had been helpful to them during the fall semester and in
2
part to remind parents of the manual so they might
continue to use it during the spring semester.
Outcome Variables
Two outcome variables were studied to determine the
effect of intervention on students' retention rates:
1) academic persistence, defined as being
enrolled for a given
semester.
2) academic persistence in good standing,
defined as being
enrolled for a given semester and entering that
semester with
no academic action taken as a result of the previous
semester.
All data concerning registration status and academic
performance were obtained from University records. Data were analyzed for four
semesters subsequent to the initial semester of intervention.
RESULTS
A total of 69 sets of parents (or 65% of the parent
sets attending the two sessions of parent orientation in which the academic
success project was described) indicated an interest in participating in the
project.
Thirty-eight percent of the parent sets
returned their project evaluation form mailed to them in early January 1989
right after fall semester grades were mailed. Since the evaluation was meant to
be anonymous, there was no follow-up to increase the proportion of returned forms.
Thirty-one percent of those who returned the
form reported
3
they had occasion to use the Resource Manual with
their child during the fall semester. One hundred percent of those who used the
manual reported they found it helpful. Table 1 shows academic persistence rates
for the treatment and comparison groups. Table 1 Academic Persistence by
Group
Table 1: Academic Persistence by Group |
|||||
|
Group |
|
|||
|
Treatment |
|
Comparison |
||
Semester |
N |
% |
|
n |
% |
initial n |
69 |
|
|
50 |
|
S '89 |
65 |
94 |
|
48 |
96 |
F '89 |
59 |
86 |
|
34 |
68* |
S '90 |
56 |
81 |
|
33 |
66 |
F '90 |
53 |
77 |
|
32 |
64* |
*p<.05
Table 2 shows rates of academic persistence in good
standing
for the two groups.
Table 2: Academic Persistence in Good Standing by
Group |
|||||
|
Group |
|
|||
|
Treatment |
|
Comparison |
||
Semester |
n |
% |
|
n |
% |
initial n |
69 |
|
|
50 |
|
S '89 |
54 |
78 |
|
31 |
62* |
F '89 |
51 |
74 |
|
29 |
58 |
S '90 |
53 |
77 |
|
29 |
58* |
F '90 |
50 |
72 |
|
29 |
58 |
4
DISCUSSION
Students whose parents were sent a Resource
Manual as part of the parents' support project persisted at higher rates
than students whose parents were not sent the manual, for three of the four
semesters studied. Two years after the semester of intervention, over 3/4 (77%)
of the treatment group were still enrolled, and 72% were enrolled in good
academic standing. On the other hand, approximately two-thirds (64%) of
the comparison group were still enrolled, and only 58% were enrolled in good
academic standing.
It is interesting to note that less than one-third
of the parents who returned their evaluation form indicated they had occasion
to use the Resource Manual during or immediately after their student's
first semester at UMCP. Our mailing of the evaluation form was timed to
coincide with the mailing of fall semester grades. It may be that the students
in the treatment group were doing well enough both academically and non-academically
not to warrant use of the Resource Manual. It may also be that parents
began to use the manual, as problems arose, after receiving the evaluation and
were reminded of its potential usefulness.
Parents play an important role as a base of support
for their students. Giving parents printed material helpful in making that
support informed, at least about resources on campus, seems to be an effective
way of helping their students achieve their academic goals.
5